Data Protection Is Everyone’s Job

As the lines between technology and law continue to blur, the duty of technology competence has become a critical aspect of a lawyer’s ethical obligations. The majority of state ethics rules, adopting the stance of the American Bar Association (ABA), have made it clear that staying updated on technology is not just an optional skill but an ethical requirement.

However, the potential consequences of data breaches can range from embarrassing to catastrophic—and sometimes even criminal. Data protection in the legal industry is about more than just compliance—it’s about safeguarding the very fabric of client trust and professional integrity.

Why ESI must be protected

The sheer volume and variety of data that organizations generate today is staggering. For legal practitioners, this data is not just a collection of documents—it often contains highly sensitive information such as personally identifiable information, protected health information, client data, trade secrets, and even privileged communications. When mishandled or exposed, these data pools become a goldmine for hackers.

Lawyers must understand that data protection is everyone’s job, not just the IT department’s. While IT teams may handle the technical aspects of data security, lawyers have an ethical duty to protect client confidentiality. This includes understanding the technology used in their practice, from eDiscovery tools to the different data storage solutions. Protecting sensitive information involves both legal knowledge and technological competence to ensure the integrity of client data and upholding the trust that is fundamental to the attorney-client relationship.

The consequences of data loss in the legal industry are devastating for affected clients and the legal professionals involved. The potential fallout from such incidents can be categorized into four key areas: ethical, legal, financial, and reputational.

Ethical and professional consequences

Lawyers are bound by strict ethical obligations to maintain the confidentiality of client information. Under the state ethics rules adopting American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6(c), attorneys must make reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to or disclosure of client information. A data breach that compromises sensitive client data can be seen as a breach of this duty, potentially leading to disciplinary action by bar associations or other regulatory bodies.

Additionally, a data loss incident can lead to a waiver of attorney-client privilege if confidential communications are inadvertently exposed. This could compromise the integrity of ongoing cases and weaken the legal protections afforded to clients, placing their interests—and the lawyer’s professional standing—at risk.

Finally, and perhaps most critically, lawyers have an ethical duty, promulgated in ABA Model Rule 1.1 and adopted by many state ethics rules, to maintain technology competence. They must stay informed about the technological tools and practices that affect their ability to protect client information. In the data protection realm, legal professionals must understand and implement security measures to safeguard sensitive data.

Legal and regulatory repercussions

Legal practitioners who fail to protect sensitive information may face significant legal and regulatory consequences.

For example, the unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable health information (PHI) can result in severe penalties under laws like the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA). Breaches of the strict data privacy and security standards in these laws can lead to fines and mandatory reporting requirements.

For companies and firms operating within or interacting with the European Union, breaches involving personally identifiable information can lead to substantial fines under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This regulation mandates rigorous data protection measures, and noncompliance can result in penalties of up to 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher.

Depending on the jurisdiction, legal practices may also need to comply with state-level data breach notification laws, securities regulations, and industry-specific guidelines. Failing to report a breach or adequately protect data can result in costly penalties and legal actions.

Financial costs

The financial impact of a data breach can be staggering. Beyond potential fines and penalties, law firms and organizations may incur significant costs related to breach investigation, remediation, and litigation.

For instance, lawyers may need to engage forensic experts to investigate the breach, determine its scope, and secure their systems. This process can be time-consuming and costly. If clients or third parties are harmed by the breach, they may file lawsuits against the firm or company. Legal defense costs, along with potential settlements or judgments, can result in substantial financial liabilities. Finally, restoring data, enhancing security measures, and managing the fallout from a breach can involve significant expense. This may include updating technology, training staff, and implementing more robust data protection protocols.

Reputational damage

Perhaps the most lasting consequence of a data breach is reputational damage. In an industry where trust and confidentiality are paramount, a breach can undermine client confidence and result in the loss of business.

Negative press coverage and social media backlash can be difficult to recover from, especially if the breach is severe or involves high-profile clients. News of a data breach can spread quickly, affecting current and prospective clients. A tarnished reputation can make it difficult to attract new business and may even lead to difficulties in recruiting talent.

Five key strategies for protecting ESI

Legal professionals must adopt a comprehensive approach to data protection to mitigate the risks associated with ESI. This includes implementing security compliance frameworks, role-based access controls, and data encryption, as well as choosing the appropriate data storage solutions and adapting to ransomware threats. While these strategies may involve technical measures, it is critical to recognize that data security is not just an IT issue—it is everyone’s responsibility across the organization, from lawyers to support staff.

Below are five strategies that practitioners should implement to safeguard ESI effectively.

1. Security compliance frameworks

Security compliance frameworks are essential for ensuring that data protection measures meet industry standards. Three notable frameworks that are commonly applied in the legal industry are the ISO, SOC2, and NIST standards:

• ISO 27001/27002: Compliance with these internationally recognized standards and controls for information security management, including policies, procedures, technical measures, and training, demonstrates a top-down commitment to the systematic management of sensitive information, reducing risks.
• SOC2: Developed by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), SOC2 is a set of auditing standards focused on security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. SOC2 is particularly relevant in assessing the effectiveness of an organization’s controls over data security.
• NIST SP 800-53: Originally developed for U.S. federal government information systems, this framework provides a catalog of security controls that has also been widely adopted in the private sector, including the legal industry.

Implementing these frameworks helps legal professionals align their data protection practices with recognized standards, thereby reducing the risk of breaches.

2. Role-based access controls

Role-based access controls restrict data access to authorized users based on their roles within the organization. For instance, a lawyer may have full access to case files, while an IT administrator may only have access to system settings, not the content of those files. Segmenting access helps maintain the principle of least privilege, reducing the risk of unauthorized disclosure.

By implementing access controls, legal organizations can better control access to sensitive information, ensuring that only those who need the data to perform their duties have access to it. This is a reminder that everyone in the organization must play a part in securing data—whether by limiting access or ensuring that the correct security measures are followed.

3. Data storage: Cloud vs. on-premises

Choosing between cloud storage and on-premises storage is a critical decision for legal practitioners, as it affects data security and accessibility.

Public cloud providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) offer scalability and ease of access. However, it is vital to approach cloud storage with care, particularly regarding the security controls in place to manage access and encryption.

On-premises storage gives organizations greater control over their data, including its physical location and security. It is often preferred by organizations with specific regulatory or heightened security requirements.

The choice between cloud and on-premises storage should align with your organization’s security needs and regulatory requirements. Some organizations may opt for a hybrid approach, combining both methods to leverage the advantages of each.

4. Data encryption

Data encryption ensures that data remains secure, whether it is stored (at rest) or being transmitted (in transit). Encryption at rest protects data stored on physical and digital media, such as hard drives and servers. Legal documents, case files, and client data should be encrypted to prevent unauthorized access. Encryption in transit uses secure communication protocols such as SSL/TLS to safeguard data being transmitted over networks.

By encrypting data at rest and in transit, legal practitioners can ensure that sensitive information remains confidential, even if it falls into the wrong hands.

5. Adapting to ransomware threats

The legal industry must adapt to the evolving landscape of ransomware threats. Cybercriminals increasingly target law firms and legal departments, making it essential for organizations to stay ahead of these threats.

Robust security programs must include, at a minimum, regular backups, employee training, network segmentation, and advanced endpoint detection and response solutions. Participating in threat intelligence sharing communities and having an incident response plan are also crucial for mitigating ransomware risks. By proactively addressing ransomware threats, legal practitioners can protect their organizations from the potentially devastating impacts of these attacks.

The high stakes of data protection

For legal practitioners, data protection is more than just a technical requirement—it is an ethical duty, a legal obligation, and a cornerstone of client trust. Lawyers must understand that protecting sensitive information isn’t just the responsibility of the IT department or the security team; it requires active participation and awareness from everyone involved. As technology continues to evolve, so too must the strategies for protecting ESI, and every member of the legal team has a role to play in safeguarding client data and maintaining professional integrity.

‍