Alphabet Soup: TAR CAL, and Assisted Review
-min.avif)
Matthew Verga is an attorney, consultant, and eDiscovery expert proficient at leveraging his legal experience, his technical knowledge, and his communication skills to make complex eDiscovery topics accessible to diverse audiences. A fifteen-year industry veteran, Matthew has worked across every phase of the EDRM and at every level, from the project trenches to enterprise program design. As Director of Education for Consilio, he leverages this background to produce engaging educational content to empower practitioners at all levels with knowledge they can use to improve their projects, their careers, and their organizations.
Summary
Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.
This white paper explores these complexities to better equip you to leverage TAR and CAL in your matters. We will discuss a variety of topics, including key terms and concepts; different approaches and their applications; quality of results; permission for use; compulsion to use; process transparency and objections; and, using search terms before TAR.
In this Whitepaper
- Key terms and concepts
- Approaches and their applications
- A decade of relevant case law
Key Insights
- The importance of Sedona Principle 6
- How good is good enough
- Courts’ preference for transparency
Summary
Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.
This white paper explores these complexities to better equip you to leverage TAR and CAL in your matters. We will discuss a variety of topics, including key terms and concepts; different approaches and their applications; quality of results; permission for use; compulsion to use; process transparency and objections; and, using search terms before TAR.
In this Whitepaper
- Key terms and concepts
- Approaches and their applications
- A decade of relevant case law
Key Insights
- The importance of Sedona Principle 6
- How good is good enough
- Courts’ preference for transparency
