ホーム
すべてのリソース
コンシリオ・アドバンスト・ラーニング・インスティテュート

Practice Guide: Alphabet Soup: TAR CAL, and Assisted Review

Written by admin

Updated: Apr 18, 2022

Authors

Matthew Verga, Esq.

Director of Education

About Author

Matthew Verga is an attorney, consultant, and eDiscovery expert proficient at leveraging his legal experience, his technical knowledge, and his communication skills to make complex eDiscovery topics accessible to diverse audiences. A fifteen-year industry veteran, Matthew has worked across every phase of the EDRM and at every level, from the project trenches to enterprise program design. As Director of Education for Consilio, he leverages this background to produce engaging educational content to empower practitioners at all levels with knowledge they can use to improve their projects, their careers, and their organizations.

More from the author

Summary

Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.

This white paper explores these complexities to better equip you to leverage TAR and CAL in your matters. We will discuss a variety of topics, including key terms and concepts; different approaches and their applications; quality of results; permission for use; compulsion to use; process transparency and objections; and, using search terms before TAR.

In this Whitepaper

  • Key terms and concepts
  • Approaches and their applications
  • A decade of relevant case law

Key Insights

  • The importance of Sedona Principle 6
  • How good is good enough
  • Courts’ preference for transparency

Summary

Over the decade since TAR first rose to prominence, solutions, acronyms, and new cases have proliferated dramatically. All of this rapid technical and legal evolution has made it challenging for practitioners to get a simple handle on TAR and CAL approaches and what they mean for their matters.

This white paper explores these complexities to better equip you to leverage TAR and CAL in your matters. We will discuss a variety of topics, including key terms and concepts; different approaches and their applications; quality of results; permission for use; compulsion to use; process transparency and objections; and, using search terms before TAR.

In this Whitepaper

  • Key terms and concepts
  • Approaches and their applications
  • A decade of relevant case law

Key Insights

  • The importance of Sedona Principle 6
  • How good is good enough
  • Courts’ preference for transparency

以下のフォームに記入して、詳細なインサイトをダウンロードしてください。

Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Consilioの最新情報にサインアップ

ロレム・イプサム・ドロール・シット・メット、コネクター・ディピッシング・エリット。様々なものを悲惨な要素にぶつけます。
ありがとう!提出物が受理されました!
「サインアップ」をクリックすると、当社に同意したものとみなされます プライバシーポリシー
おっと!フォームの送信中に問題が発生しました。