Home
All Resources
Consilio Advanced Learning Institute

Sampling Techniques for Litigation and Investigations

Written by Annie Malloy

Updated: Sep 29, 2022

Authors

Matthew Verga, Esq.

Director of Education

About Author

Matthew Verga is an attorney, consultant, and eDiscovery expert proficient at leveraging his legal experience, his technical knowledge, and his communication skills to make complex eDiscovery topics accessible to diverse audiences. A fifteen-year industry veteran, Matthew has worked across every phase of the EDRM and at every level, from the project trenches to enterprise program design. As Director of Education for Consilio, he leverages this background to produce engaging educational content to empower practitioners at all levels with knowledge they can use to improve their projects, their careers, and their organizations.

More from the author

Summary

Despite years of discussion in the eDiscovery industry about the power and importance of sampling techniques – particularly in the context of technology-assisted review (TAR), many practitioners remain unfamiliar with what they can accomplish with them and when, outside of TAR, they might do so. Beyond just being an essential part of TAR, however, there are opportunities across the phases of an eDiscovery project – whether for litigation of an investigation – to replace guesses based on anecdotal evidence with actual estimates based on formal sampling.

In this Whitepaper

  • Key terms and concepts
  • Potential applications
  • Step-by-step examples

Key Insights

  • How small samples can yield big results
  • The value of sampling for project planning
  • The importance of sampling for negotiation

Summary

Despite years of discussion in the eDiscovery industry about the power and importance of sampling techniques – particularly in the context of technology-assisted review (TAR), many practitioners remain unfamiliar with what they can accomplish with them and when, outside of TAR, they might do so. Beyond just being an essential part of TAR, however, there are opportunities across the phases of an eDiscovery project – whether for litigation of an investigation – to replace guesses based on anecdotal evidence with actual estimates based on formal sampling.

In this Whitepaper

  • Key terms and concepts
  • Potential applications
  • Step-by-step examples

Key Insights

  • How small samples can yield big results
  • The value of sampling for project planning
  • The importance of sampling for negotiation

Fill out the form below to download the complete insight.

Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Sign up for Consilio updates

Discover, learn and grow with the latest insights from Consilio
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
By clicking Subscribe you are confirming that you agree with our Privacy Policy
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.