Summary
Enormous volumes and diverse types of ESI may be relevant to a case, and this can make identification and preservation challenging. It is almost inevitable that some ESI will slip through the cracks. When that happens, FRCP 37(e) provides the framework for assessing the loss and its consequences. This provision was added as part of the 2015 amendments, after a “strikingly, perhaps uniquely, comprehensive and vigorous” public comment period. It sought to bring predictability and consistency to a topic that had been plagued by unpredictability and inconsistent standards across jurisdictions.
In this Whitepaper
- The analysis established by FRCP 37(e)
- Assorted cases interpreting and applying the rule
- Key factors for practitioners to remember
Key Insights
- Best practices considered reasonable steps to preserve
- Kinds of conduct that have led to findings of intent to deprive
- Courts’ inherent authority to sanction beyond the rule
Whitepaper Download
About the Author
From the author
Digital Data Collections in Accordance with the Disclosure Pilot Scheme
The preservation and collection of ESI is the foundation of any disclosure exercise. In the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, the gathering of ESI must be conducted in accordance with the Practice Direction 51U - Disclosure Pilot Scheme.
Why Now Is the Time for Legal Teams to Invest in Self-Service eDiscovery
This white paper reviews what you need to know about self-service eDiscovery, including the problems it’s designed to solve and the benefits it brings to the practice of law.